In the context of an application for authorization of treatment, the evidence did not allow the trial judge to find that the respondent was capable of consenting to or refusing the proposed treatment plan; the file is referred back to the Superior Court to rule on whether there is categorical refusal and, if applicable, on the proposed treatment plan.
This content is intended for the public covered by the exceptions of the Charter of the French language and its regulations. If you read on, you confirm that you fall within one of these exceptions.
Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l'Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (St. Mary's Hospital Center) v. R.C.
Read the full text:
Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Ouest-de-l’Île-de-Montréal (St. Mary’s Hospital Center) v. R.C.